Paris-Bagdad, le chant du bulbul
Des bribes d’un vieux poème appris à l’école lui reviennent en mémoire :
Ô Voisine, nous sommes tous deux étrangers sur cette terre,
Et tout étranger pour son semblable est un frère.
Paris-Bagdad, le chant du bulbul
Des bribes d’un vieux poème appris à l’école lui reviennent en mémoire :
Ô Voisine, nous sommes tous deux étrangers sur cette terre,
Et tout étranger pour son semblable est un frère.
Un député israélien proclame la suprématie de la « race juive » | The Times of Israël
Miki Zohar, affilié au Likud, affirme que les Juifs, étant « les plus intelligents au monde », savent que Netanyhau n’est pas corrompu
Par STUART WINER
Un député du parti au pouvoir du Likud a déclaré mercredi que « la race juive » était la plus intelligente au monde et possédait le « plus grand capital humain », et c’est pour cela, a-t-il dit, que le public israélien ne se laisse pas berner par les accusations portées contre le Premier ministre Benjamin Netanyahu.
Miki Zohar a tenu ces propos durant un débat à la radio avec le journaliste Dan Margalit, au sujet des enquêtes pour corruption, dans lesquelles Netanyahu est suspect, ou au sujet desquelles il a été interrogé.
Recevez gratuitement notre édition quotidienne par mail pour ne rien manquer du meilleur de l’info INSCRIPTION GRATUITE !
Ses affirmations ont déclenché une querelle avec le député de la Liste arabe unie Ahmad Tibi, qui a fait remarquer que les nazis traitaient les Juifs comme une race pendant la Shoah.
Selon un récent sondage d’opinion, Netanyahu bénéficie d’un soutien important, en dépit du fait qu’il soit suspect dans trois enquêtes pour corruption, a déclaré Zohar, ajoutant que la focalisation des médias sur les enquêtes n’a pas permis de convaincre le public israélien que Netanyahu est inapte à gouverner.
« Je peux vous dire quelque chose de fondamental », a dit Zohar durant un débat sur la station 103FM.
« Vous ne pouvez pas berner les Juifs, quoi qu’en disent les médias. Le public israélien est un public qui appartient à la race juive, et l’ensemble de la race juive a le plus haut capital humain, le plus intelligent, le plus apte à comprendre. Le public sait ce que le Premier ministre fait pour le pays, et qu’il excelle dans ses fonctions. »
Tibi a répondu en publiant sur Twitter une photo de Zohar avec le message : « Un élu officiel dans ‘l’état juif’ présente : la théorie de la race ».
Tibi, dont le parti et ses membres ont déjà suscité la colère de ses confrères juifs, pour son soutien ouvert à la cause palestinienne, a ensuite publié une photo de lui en train de lire Requiem allemand, un livre d’Amos Elon qui se penche sur les effets de la Shoah sur le judaïsme allemand.
Dans les archives 2008
Les héritiers de Marek Edelman solidaires du peuple palestinien
Le 2 mai 2008, « les filles et fils de Marek Edelman... » publiaient un communiqué sur l’anniversaire de la révolte du ghetto de Varsovie et la solidarité aujourd’hui avec les Palestiniens.
« Les filles et fils de Marek Edelman... et d’Henri Curiel, Schmerke Kaczerginski, Lucien David Fayman, Jacov Stambul, Dvoira Vainberg… »
« A 65 ans du soulèvement du Ghetto de Varsovie, nous rendons hommage a tous ceux, modestes héros et héroïnes, qui ont engagé leur vie dans une bataille face à l’armée d’un pouvoir qui contrôlait presque toute l’Europe. Face à l’oppression, il y a toujours résistance : contre le nazisme en France, à Vilnius, en Allemagne même et, des années après, en Egypte et en Algérie contre le pouvoir colonial aussi bien qu’en Afrique du Sud contre l’apartheid. »
« Il en est de même aujourd’hui : les masques changent mais c’est toujours le même combat. Nous, filles et fils de résistants au nazisme, affirmons notre soutien a la résistance palestinienne, car le pouvoir sioniste en Israël, a usurpé notre nom collectif (juifs), pour en notre nom disent-ils, mener une politique de répression coloniale féroce et d’apartheid. »
« L’hommage à nos parents, martyrs ou survivants, est à l’unisson de l’hommage aux résistants du peuple palestinien dont les droits fondamentaux, humains et nationaux sont bafoués, jour après jour depuis 60 ans. »
Erdoğan’s Persistent Popularity - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
On the eve of early parliamentary and presidential elections on June 24, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan appears poised to claim yet another victory, with enduring popularity even beyond Turkey’s borders. What is more surprising is that Erdoğan managed to sustain his appeal in the face of Turkey’s growing authoritarianism and rapidly deteriorating human rights record.
A recent survey sheds some empirical light on the various dynamics that underlie Erdoğan’s regional popularity, with notable implications for the relationship between religion and politics.1 The survey data show Erdoğan’s popularity is particularly strong among some segments of the population. Respondents who ideologically self-identified as Islamist, favored a prominent role for religious leaders in politics, and considered religion to be important in their lives trusted Erdoğan the most as an authority on religious matters. By contrast, respondents with a college education or who had a monthly income over $1,000 were less likely to trust Erdoğan.
Egypte, Palestine, Gaza
At the terminal: Stories from the Rafah Border Crossing
It has been one month since the Rafah Border Crossing was opened, marking the longest window in which Gazans have been permitted to leave and reenter the besieged Gaza Strip since 2013.
What was initially purported to be a four-day opening was extended on May 17, when President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi announced that travel across the Egypt-Gaza border would be permitted throughout the month of Ramadan.
From Gaza to the outside world
Mada Masr spoke to several travelers waiting at the on the Palestinian side of the crossing.
Zuheir al-Qashash, 44, was there with his family, which includes four children. “I sold my apartment, man,” he says. “I registered my entire family for crossing, and we are going to live with my mother in Egypt. To live in Gaza is to die slowly. I will not have my children [continue to] suffer through what we have been experiencing for the past 10 years.”
Qashash tells Mada Masr that he paid nearly US$7,000 for registration and “coordination in order to cross through Rafah.”
“It’s a big gamble,” he says. “But the biggest gamble of all is to patiently wait in Gaza, in hopes that the conditions will improve.”
To travel across the Rafah crossing, Palestinians must board special busses and pay large sums of money to register through travel agencies in Gaza. These agencies then submit applications to officers on the Egyptian side, according to several people who attempted the trip. Once officials in Palestine receive a select list of names approved by the Egyptians, they notify those selected to prepare to cross. The list, however, is always handwritten and never bears the official mark of Egypt’s Interior Ministry or any other government agency.
Palestinians have left the Gaza Strip in increasing numbers since the 2014 war with Israel. It is not unusual for entire families to leave at the same time, according to copies of the lists of travelers obtained by Mada Masr. Some of these families have since relocated to Europe.
The sight of entire families waiting at the Palestinian terminal for their passage to be approved has become increasingly common, following Sisi’s Ramadan announcement.
Dans l’ émission de ce jour ,nous vous proposons une rencontre croisée avec Ivan Segré et Dominique Vidal pour leurs livres respectifs : « Les pingouins de l’universel . Antijudaïsme, antisémitisme, antisionisme » (Lignes, 2017) et « Antisionisme = antisémitisme ? Réponse à Emmanuel Macron », paru en janvier dernier aux éditions Libertalia. Cette rencontre se tenait le 31 mai dernier à la librairie scop Envie de lire à Ivry-sur-Seine. Durée : 1h. Source : Fréquence Paris Plurielle
Journalists beaten, cameras destroyed: Palestinian police break up anti-Abbas protest in Ramallah
Dozens beaten and arrested, including foreign journalists, in breakup of demonstration against Abbas’s economic sanctions on Gaza
Amira Hass and Jack Khoury Jun 14, 2018
Palestinian Authority riot police forcefully broke up a demonstration in Ramallah Wednesday evening, enforcing a ban on protests citing the Id al-Fitr holiday, which marks the end of the Ramadan month of fasting.
The police arrested journalist and dozens of protesters, busted cameras and beat many of the demonstrators.
The protesters called for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to remove sanctions he has imposed against Hamas and residents of the Gaza Strip, for Hamas’s failure to follow through on a power share deal.
Palestinian security forces fired tear gas, stun grenades and shot bullets into the air. They confiscated cameras and smartphones, breaking a few of them and ordered journalists not to interview demonstrators. The police arrested foreign and Palestinian journalists and beat a large number of protesters. A number of Israeli citizens participated in the protest, too.
In spite of the violent repression of the protest, a small group of demonstrators managed to evade the police and gathered on side streets, chanting slogans such as: “Woe to the disgrace and woe to the shame,” and “With spirit and blood we will redeem you, Gaza.”
Top U.S. officials to Haaretz: Peace plan will be basis for talks, not ’take it or leave it’ document
Senior officials say the plan will be revealed soon and stress that Trump sees Palestinian President Abbas as the only ’relevant address’
Jun 13, 2018
WASHINGTON – The Trump administration’s plan for peace in the Middle East won’t be a “take it or leave it” proposal, but rather a basis for direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, administration officials told Haaretz this week. They said the plan will be revealed soon, and that the White House hopes to share it not only with the leaders in the region, but also with the general public.
The officials said previous reports that the plan would be released immediately at the end of the Muslim month of Ramadan were incorrect. “We hope to release it in the near future, but not immediately after Ramadan,” one official explained. “Our top priority is to put it out at the right moment, so that the various spoilers who don’t want us to succeed have less of a chance to cause damage.”
>> Palestinians to U.S.: No ’Deal of the Century’ if Jerusalem Not Addressed ■ U.S. Hopes to Unveil Breakthrough in Gaza Cease-fire Alongside Israeli-Palestinian Peace Plan
While there have been some reports asserting that the plan will be a blueprint for a final peace agreement that the two sides will have to either accept or reject, the officials who spoke with Haaretz said those reports, too, were inaccurate.
“We have said all along that we don’t want to impose an agreement. So presenting the plan as a ‘take it or leave it’ kind of document would be inconsistent with that,” one official explained. “We are a facilitator. It would be arrogant to assume we know better than anyone else,” said a second official. “At the end of the day, the two sides need to negotiate and reach an agreement. We want to help them reach that point, but we can’t structure the agreement for them.”
Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
Email* Sign up
The officials criticized Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for refusing to engage with the administration, a position he has held to ever since Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel last December. “We assume there will be fair and substantial criticism of the plan, but we are astonished that Abbas won’t even see it,” one official said. “It would be a shame for the Palestinian people if the Palestinian leadership refuses to engage with this plan.”
At the same time, the officials stressed that the Trump administration is not looking for a way to bypass Abbas, and is not speaking to any other Palestinian political figures. “We are not trying to engage with any Palestinian politicians except President Abbas. He is the relevant address, and he is the one we hope to work with,” one official said.
>> Trump Mideast envoy: The Palestinians deserve so much more than Saeb Erekat ■ Erekat fires back: Trump administration is killing the peace process, not me
Last month Haaretz reported that the only recent contact between high-ranking Palestinian and American officials was a meeting between Abbas’ security chief, Majid Faraj, and Mike Pompeo, who is now Secretary of State and headed the CIA at the time of the meeting. Palestinian officials explained that the meeting focused only on security and intelligence issues, which are not included in the Palestinian Authority’s political and diplomatic boycott of the administration.
The administration officials emphasized that they are encouraged by signs that Arab countries are getting closer to Israel, but added that they have no illusions about the Arab world “abandoning” the Palestinians as part of an alliance with Israel. “It’s not realistic to expect that the Arabs would abandon the Palestinians. That’s not going to happen,” one of the officials stated. The Arab states, in the administration’s view, can help encourage the two sides to move forward with negotiations – but aren’t expected to force anything on either side.
Under previous administrations, there were different approaches with regard to public exposure of detailed plans for Middle East peace. The George W. Bush administration released its “Road Map for Peace” in a speech by the president. The peace plan of former Secretary of State John Kerry, by contrast, was never made public (although drafts of it were published by Haaretz last June.)
The current administration is considering making its peace plan available to the public, but only after its final version is shared with the leaders in the region. “We want the public to know what is in it, at the right time, because the public needs to support it, not just the leaders,” said one official. “At the end of the day, the public is part of the process. The leaders need to have public support for going forward with this.”
The officials who spoke with Haaretz could not share specific details about the plan, which they said is close to being finalized. Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, will travel to the region next week with Jason Greenblatt, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East peace process, to discuss the plan with leaders in Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and possibly also other countries.
The Trump administration’s main foreign policy focus this week, of course, was the summit in Singapore in which Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. The officials who spoke with Haaretz said the summit proves that Trump’s unusual approach to foreign policy is working, adding that “this event should give hope to people in the Middle East that things can get better.”
One official contended that “this event shows how suddenly and unexpectedly things can change, and how intractable positions can potentially be softened and modified. The members of our peace team have a lot of experience as negotiators. We know that positions can change. We know that views can be morphed.”
The officials said a Middle East peace deal is still a top priority for Trump. “The president has the same level of dedication on this issue as he does on the Korean issue,” they maintained.
When asked if it is possible that following his summit with Kim, Trump will lose interest in an Israeli-Palestinian deal since he no longer needs a foreign policy achievement to present to the American public, one official used a metaphor from Trump’s real estate career to explain why he’s convinced that that’s not going to happen.
“The president built Trump Tower, and then what did he do after that? He went and he built another five Trump Towers,” the official said.
“He didn’t just stop with one.”
Ethiopie : vers une paix sous influence saoudienne
Depuis l’arrivée au pouvoir d’Abiy Ahmed, Addis-Abeba s’est rapproché de ses ennemis historiques, l’Egypte et l’Erythrée, grâce aux bons offices de Riyad.
Par Jean-Philippe Rémy (Johannesburg, correspondant régional)
Il y a quelques mois, Abiy Ahmed, le nouveau premier ministre éthiopien, était à peu près inconnu du grand public et pouvait encore se rendre à la gym. Retrouvant une connaissance sur les appareils de cardio pour transpirer et débattre, l’ancien lieutenant-colonel, un temps ministre des sciences et des technologies, pronostiquait un grand avenir à la Corne de l’Afrique mais avertissait : « Si on veut que notre région décolle, il faut en finir avec les crises et, pour cela, il faut tout bouleverser. »
Le bouleversement, dans l’immédiat, a pris son visage. Mais derrière, c’est tout l’équilibre des forces, dans cette partie du monde à cheval entre Afrique et péninsule arabique, qui vient de subir une inflexion majeure.
Lire aussi : En Ethiopie, Abiy Ahmed, premier ministre en mission d’apaisement
Depuis qu’il est arrivé à la tête de l’Ethiopie, le 2 avril, Abiy Ahmed s’emploie à jouer le rôle de faiseur de paix à l’intérieur comme à l’extérieur de son pays de 104 millions d’habitants, menacé par les prémices d’une série d’insurrections. Il libère des opposants, enthousiasme la rue, loue le travail des médias. Il enchaîne aussi les visites dans la région pour y nouer des relations qui répondent à deux priorités complémentaires : créer ou raviver des alliances politiques, faciliter de futurs échanges.
Il a par exemple jeté les bases d’une participation éthiopienne dans le futur port de Lamu, au Kenya. Si le projet voit le jour, cela signifie que l’Ethiopie aura un nouvel accès maritime, en plus de Djibouti, Berbera (Somaliland) et Port-Soudan (Soudan). On voit le dessein. Il s’inscrit dans le développement de grandes infrastructures sur la façade orientale de l’Afrique, dont une partie est liée au projet chinois des « nouvelles routes de la soie ». Mais tout cet ensemble marque le pas, essentiellement en raison de conflits locaux aux implications régionales.
Silwan, a model for oppression - Haaretz Editorial
The state and a right-wing group are shamefully fighting to evict Palestinians from a Jerusalem neighborhood, citing technical grounds
Haaretz EditorialSendSend me email alerts
Jun 11, 2018 4:42 AM
Even given the corruption and legal chicanery typical of the settlement enterprise, the case of the Silwan neighborhood’s Batan al-Hawa section stands out. In this case, the state, through the Justice Ministry’s administrator general, transferred an entire neighborhood of 700 people to right-wing group Ateret Cohanim without bothering to inform the Palestinians living in this part of Jerusalem.
To be more precise, in 2002 the administrator general released the land in the center of Silwan to a trust established way back in 1899. A year earlier, with the administrator’s approval, three Ateret Cohanim activists were appointed trustees. Since then, the organization has invested considerable efforts to get rid of the Palestinian families; to date a number of families have been evicted and dozens are conducting legal battles to fight eviction.
On Sunday, around 100 Silwan residents came to the Supreme Court building for a hearing on their petition to the High Court of Justice against the original decision to release the land to the trust. The petition addresses the question of whether the original trust was for the land or for the buildings on it, all but one of which was demolished in the 1940s.
Finale de Roland-Garros : Roger Waters avait un message politique à faire passer dans les tribunes
10/06/2018 16:17 CEST
(...) Le musicien britannique avait d’ailleurs un message politique à faire passer. Et ce, via sa tenu. L’ancien bassiste des Pink Floyd arborait en effet le Keffieh palestinien, comme vous pouvez le voir ci-dessous. Il faut dire que Roger Waters est un des plus fervents soutiens à la cause palestinienne. « Que la police vienne m’arrêter ! Parce que je milite pour les Palestiniens qui sont tués comme des chiens. Personne n’élève la voix en Occident. Dites à Monsieur Macron qu’il est temps que ça cesse ! Beaucoup ont oublié 1789, mais moi je m’en souviens. C’est dans votre grand pays qu’est née l’idée que tous les hommes sont égaux », avait par exemple lancé le musicien en mai dernier à Lyon.
Poll shows deep divisions between Israeli and US Jews on Trump, peace, religion | The Times of Israel
An opinion poll published Sunday shows deep divisions between Israeli and American Jews, particularly in relation to US President Donald Trump, highlighting the growing rift between the world’s two largest Jewish communities.
The survey by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) showed 77 percent of Israeli Jews approved of the president’s handling of US-Israel relations, while only 34 percent of American Jews did. Fifty-seven percent of US Jews disapproved, while only 10 percent of Israeli Jews did.
Concerning the recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, and the relocation of the US embassy to the city, 85% of Israeli Jews support the decision, compared to just 46% of US Jews. Forty-seven percent of American Jews opposed the move, a position held by only 7% of Israelis.
’Riyadhology’ and Muhammad bin Salman’s Telltale Succession - Lawfare
By Chibli Mallat Friday, June 8, 2018,
Saudi Arabia’s monarchy entered a new era last June when King Salman’s ambitious son Muhammad bin Salman, then just shy of 32, was made crown prince by royal order. MBS, as he is widely known, displaced Muhammad bin Nayef, an influential prince with deep ties to Washington, as next in line to the throne, marking a shift from the aging sons of the country’s founder, ‘Abd al-Aziz ibn Saud, to a younger coterie of royals—and skipping the generation in between. Since even before his accession to crown prince, MBS promoted a dynamic agenda of economic and social reforms—with plans to diversify the country’s economy, expand women’s rights and grant greater openness to Western culture—while also cracking down on political dissent.
There are different ways to try to decipher the political intrigue among the Saudi royal family. Among the best available tea leaves are the Saudis’ own legal pronouncements, and the royal orders that brought MBS to his current position are telling. Clearly rushed and poorly vetted, they suggest that King Salman and MBS were working outside the normal process for consensus within the royal family and that there is significant opposition to MBS’s rule waiting in the wings.
Otherwise dry Saudi legal texts tell us much about “Riyadhology”—the Saudi equivalent of Kremlinology in the days of Soviet signal opacity. Laws of social science are more elusive, but I have defended the concept of “constitutional science” against skeptical editors, and sometimes prevailed. If one looks closely enough at key constitutional clauses, the wording reveals a compromise of political powers, each trying to push the language to his advantage. This is trite. More daring is the proposal that the fractured logic of these texts can give clues about a coming crisis.
When MBS was appointed crown prince in June 2017, the irregularities in the official process portended trouble. At stake is the transition of power from King Salman to his son.
Islam’s New ‘Native Informants’ | by Nesrine Malik | NYR Daily | The New York Review of Books
Returning from Lebanon and Egypt in 2003, Edward Said wrote an angry dispatch in the London Review of Books on how the Iraq War as reported on Arabic TV channels portrayed a different conflict from the one reported by the American media, in which journalists were “as lost as the English-speaking soldiers they have been living with.” He argued that the stream of Western commentary “has obscured the negligence of the military and policy experts who planned it and now justify it.” The misguided belief that the Iraqis would welcome the Americans with glee after a period of aerial bombardment, a fundamental flaw in the planning of the military mission, he pinned squarely on the out-of-touch exiled Iraqi opposition and the two Middle East experts who, at the time, held the most sway over US foreign policy in the region: Bernard Lewis and Fouad Ajami.
Said dismissed Bernard Lewis as an Orientalist, a generalist, and an ideologue. But the Lebanese-born Fouad Ajami was damned in fewer words: he was a “native informant.” By that was meant one who deploys “we,” Said wrote, “as an imperial collectivity which, along with Israel, never does anything wrong. Arabs are to blame for everything and therefore deserve ‘our’ contempt and hostility.” In a profile of Ajami written for The Nation that appeared at almost the same time, Adam Shatz observed that Ajami’s failure to predict the Saudi conveyor-belt of radicalization that brought about 9/11 (so focused was he on “the menace of Saddam and the treachery of Arafat) still had not dented his Middle East expert credentials as far as the US media were concerned. “America was going to war with Muslims,” Shatz wrote, “and a trusted native informant was needed.”
Fifteen calamitous years later, the scorn that the late Ajami received at the time has been vindicated. But the term “native informant” has become a troubling one. As a derogatory description of an indigenous person considered a collaborator with the colonial or invading power, it sits too closely for comfort to slurs such as “house slave” and its derivatives. In the discipline of postcolonial studies, “native informant” was once useful in understanding the way certain cultural brokers from former colonies could benefit from helping more powerful Western authorities objectify their people. In an essay on the Lebanese-American academic Evelyne Accad, the scholar Dorothy Figueira described native informants as “disciplinary gatekeepers providing an authoritative version of history for the upper classes (reformers or nationalists), and the West.” But in a world where these “authoritative versions” are not simply academic, but can also be the ideological underpinnings of military aggression, the native informant’s role is that of enabler.
After killing Razan al-Najjar, IDF assassinates her character Haaretz.com - Gideon Levy | Jun. 10, 2018 | 12:47 AM
A few short words – “Razan al-Najjar isn’t an angel of mercy” – sum up the depths of Israeli propaganda. Avichay Edraee, the Israeli army’s Arabic-language spokesman, who also speaks in my name, is a representative of an army of mercy that has also now appointed itself the judge of the measure of mercy in a medic treating Palestinian wounded on Gaza’s border with Israel, and who Israeli army soldiers mercilessly killed. After killing her, it was also necessary to assassinate her character.
Propaganda is a tool that serves many countries. The less just their policies are, the more they expand their propaganda efforts. Sweden doesn’t need propaganda. North Korea does. In Israel, it’s called hasbara – public diplomacy – because why would it need propaganda? Recently its propaganda has sunk to such despicable lows that nothing can better prove that its justifications have run out, its excuses gone, that truth is the enemy and that all that’s left are lies and slander.
It is directed mostly for domestic consumption. Around the world, few gaza people would buy it in any event. But as part of the desperate effort to persist in the psychological repression and denial, in the failure to tell ourselves the truth and the evasion of any responsibility – everything is acceptable when it comes to these efforts.
A medic in a nursing uniform has been shot to death by Israeli army snipers – as have journalists with press vests and an amputee in a wheelchair. If we rely on Israeli army snipers to know what they are doing, counting on them to be the most accurate in the world, then these people have been shot deliberately. Surely if the army had believed in the justice of the military campaign that it is waging in Gaza, it would have taken responsibility for these killings, apologizing, expressing regret and offering compensation.
But when the earth is burning under our feet, when we know the truth and understand that shooting at demonstrators and killing more than 120 of them and rendering hundreds of others disabled is more akin to a massacre, one cannot apologize or express regret. And then the army spokesman’s aggressive, clumsy, embarrassing and shameful propaganda machine springs into action – a thunderous voice from the Defense Ministry that only compounds what has been done.
Maj. Edraee released a video on Thursday in which a nurse, perhaps Najjar, is seen from the back, flinging away a smoke grenade that soldiers had thrown at her. Edraee would have done the same himself, but when it comes to desperate propaganda, it’s a smoking gun: Najjar is a terrorist. She had also said that she was a human shield. Certainly a medic is a human defender.
An Israeli army investigation, based only on the testimony of the soldiers of course, showed that she had not been deliberately shot. Clearly. The propaganda machine went further and hinted that she may have been killed by Palestinian weapons fire, which has rarely been used over the past two months.
Maybe she shot herself? Anything is possible. And do we remember any Israeli army investigation showing otherwise? Israel’s ambassador in London, Mark Regev, who is another top, polished propagandist, was quick to tweet about the “medical volunteer” in quotation marks, as if a Palestinian could be a medical volunteer. Instead, he wrote, her death is “yet another reminder of Hamas’ brutality.”
The Israeli army kills a medic in a white uniform, in an outrageous violation of international law, which provides protection for medical personnel in combat zones. And that’s despite the fact that the Gaza border does not constitute a combat zone. But it’s Hamas that is the brutal one.
Kill me, Mr. Ambassador, but who could possibly follow this twisted, sick logic? And who would buy such cheap propaganda other than some of the members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews — the largest representative organization of U.K. Jewry – along with Merav Ben Ari, the Knesset member who was quick to take advantage of the opportunity and state: “It turns out that the medic, yes that one, wasn’t just a medic, as you see.” Yes, that one. As you see.
Israel should have been shocked by the killing of the medic. Najjar’s innocent face should have touched every Israeli’s heart. Medical organizations should have spoken out. Israelis should have hidden their faces in embarrassment. But that only could have happened if Israel had believed in the justice of its cause. When fairness is gone, all that is left is propaganda. And from that standpoint, maybe this new low is a herald of good news.
Egypt : Labor union elections are back, but with few promises | MadaMasr
Labor union representatives voiced their concerns over political exclusion from union elections, which kicked off on May 23 and concluded this week.
After being postponed for 12 years, labour union elections for the period 2018-2022 were finally held under a new law passed in 2017, ending, at least on paper, 61 years of monopoly by the state-affiliated Egyptian Trade Union Federation (ETUF), and allowing for the formal creation of independent unions.
Members and leaders of independent unions, however, cite many obstacles to free and fair elections, among them the law itself governing the work of labor unions. “It was the worst labor elections Egypt has witnessed,” says Kamal Abbas, head of the Center for Trade Unions and Workers Services (CTUWS), which organized a press conference on June 3 to raise election violations.
One of the violations highlighted pertains to the ability of independent unions to regulate their legal status. While some independent unions have existed, predating the law for years, all of them now have to adhere to executive regulations in order to be recognized and ensure their members are eligible for elections.
CTUWS described the process of standardizing independent unions as “intransigent and bureaucratic practices from Ministry of Manpower directorates to prevent a right backed by law,” in a report titled, “Union freedoms — Between limited leeway and purposeful restrictions.”
Egypt : State budget favors wealthy as lower-income groups continue to disproportionately shoulder tax burden | MadaMasr
Parliament passed Egypt’s state budget for the fiscal year 2018/9, which will begin in July, on Tuesday. The budget targets a deficit of 8.4 percent of GDP, down from an estimated 9.8 percent at the end of the current fiscal year.
The tax structure in the 2018/19 state budget represents an imbalance in favor of the wealthiest and at the expense of the lower-income citizens, amid an ongoing austerity program that has included the implementation of new taxes in recent years.
A real estate tax, which functions as a tax on the wealthiest, was implemented starting July 2014, and a few years later the government introduced the value-added tax, a regressive tax that weighs more on lower income earners, who tend to use the bulk of their income on consumption-related purchases, than on wealthier individuals who have a larger capacity to save. In spite of this, this year’s state budget shows that the real estate tax and other property taxes remain a limited source of income for the government, while the share of VAT from total tax collections has grown.
This reflects an imbalance in tax justice, as the burden of financing government spending falls increasingly on lower-income earners. Property taxes, meanwhile, increased marginally as a share of total tax collection. Egypt’s state budget classifies land, building, t-bill and t-bond revenue taxes, property transfer fees and car fees as property taxes. The real estate wealth tax is classified under income tax.
Anonymous snipers and a lethal verdict
We may never know the name of the soldier who killed Razan al-Najjar. But we do know the names of those who gave the order enabling him to kill her
Amira Hass Jun 05, 2018
We know her name: Razan al-Najjar. But what’s his? What’s the name of the soldier who killed her, with direct fire to the chest last Friday? We don’t know, and we probably won’t ever know.
In contrast to the Palestinians suspected of killing Israelis, the Israeli who killed Najjar is protected from exposure to the cameras and an in-depth breakdown of his family history, including his relatives’ participation in routine attacks on Palestinians as part of their military service or their political affiliation.
Demanding Israeli microphones will not be pushed into his face with probing questions: Didn’t you see she was wearing a paramedic’s white robe when you aimed at her chest?
Didn’t you see her hair covered with a head scarf? Do your rules of engagement require you to shoot at paramedics, men and women as well, and at a distance of about 100 meters (some 330 feet) from the border fence? Did you shoot at her legs (why?) and miss because you’re useless? Are you sorry? Do you sleep well at night? Did you tell your girlfriend it was you who killed a young woman the same age as her? Was Najjar your first?
Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
Email* Sign up
The anonymity of our soldiers picking off and killing Palestinians is an inseparable part of the culture of Israeli impunity. We are above it all. Immune from everything. Allowing an anonymous soldier to kill a young paramedic with a bullet that hit her in the chest, exiting from her back, and continuing on with our lives.
>> ’We die anyway, so let it be in front of the cameras’: Conversations with Gazans
There are lots of pictures of Najjar on the internet: She stood out as one of the few women among the first aid teams operating at the “March of Return” protest sites since March 30.
After two years’ training, she volunteered for the Palestinian Medical Relief Society. She happily gave interviews, including to The New York Times’ correspondent in Gaza, speaking about the ability of women to act under difficult conditions no less so than men – and even better than them. She knew how dangerous her job was. A paramedic was killed by Israel Defense Forces fire on May 14, dozens of others were injured and suffocated as they ran to rescue the wounded.
Najjar, 21 at the time of her death, was from the village of Khuza’a, east of Khan Yunis. In interviews, she was not asked about the wars and Israeli military attacks during her childhood and later. It is hard to find their scars in her pleasant face seen on screen. In every interview, she is seen wrapped in a head scarf of a different color – and each time it is wrapped around her head stylishly, meticulously, showing an investment of time and thought. The color reveals a love for life, despite all she had gone through.
We do not know the name of the soldier, but we do know who is in the chain of command that ordered and enabled him to kill a 21-year-old paramedic: Southern Command chief Maj. Gen. Eyal Zamir. IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Gadi Eisenkot. Military Advocate General Brig. Gen. Sharon Afek and Attorney General Avichai Mendelblit, both of whom approved the wording of the rules of engagement, as the High Court justices were told before they denied petitions against the shooting at protesters along the border fence.
Despite all the testimony about civilian fatalities and horrifying injuries, the justices chose to believe what they were told in the name of the military by Avi Milikovsky, a lawyer from the State Prosecutor’s Office: The use of potentially lethal force is taken only as a last resort, in a proportionate manner and to the minimal extent required.
Please explain how this tallies with the death of Najjar, who was treating a man injured directly by a tear-gas canister. An eyewitness told The New York Times that while the injured man was being taken to an ambulance, her colleagues were treating her because she was suffering the effects of the tear gas. Then shots were heard and Najjar fell.
High Court Justices Esther Hayut, Hanan Melcer and Neal Hendel presented the army with an exemption from investigation and an exemption from criticism on a silver platter. In doing so, they joined the chain of command that ordered our anonymous soldier to fire at the chest of the paramedic and kill her.
Israel uses Diaspora Jews as human shields
Israel is happy to exploit the world’s Jews, but doesn’t care that its actions put them at risk
Yossi Klein May 31, 2018
Israel is a danger to the world’s Jews. It calls itself their protector, but doesn’t care about the consequences for them of its actions. Jews abroad pay the price of hostility to Israel, yet the state insists on wrapping them around it like a suicide vest. You want to hurt me? Okay, but be aware that they’ll blow up first.
The effects on overseas Jews aren’t part of Israel’s military calculations. It will do what it does even if it hurts them. But that won’t keep it from claiming to represent them, to speak in their name and to use them as hostages. They are the human shield. Your loyalty to your Judaism, it says, comes before your loyalty to your homeland.
The Judaism in whose name the state speaks is not that of most Diaspora Jews. Israel limits or excludes their Judaism. Israel’s Judaism is that of a minority that took over the country, and in the United States it is more attentive to evangelical Christians than it is to Reform or Conservative Jews. The state fights them, yet uses them.
Israeli governments always used Diaspora Jews. Israeliness hid behind Judaism. The dangers to which Israel exposed Diaspora Jews never deterred it. In 1956 it used Egyptian Jews to sabotage their state. It sent Jonathan Pollard to spy against his own country. It imposes itself on the world’s Jews, forcing them to debate their loyalties while insisting on equating criticism of Israel with an assault on Judaism and all Jews — that is, anti-Semitism. We have plenty of that kind of anti-Semitism right here. By this formula, half of Israel is anti-Semitic because it can’t stand the government. But the efficacy of accusing the world of anti-Semitism is waning. Overuse has worn out the shame mechanism and moved up its expiry date. Gone are the days we could justify a strike on Gaza with what was done to us in Auschwitz.
Israel won’t admit this, but from its perspective there’s an upside to anti-Semitism: It “proves” foreign countries’ failure to protect their Jews. Their negligence underscores our excellence. The head of state, who is also the head of the world’s Jews, is proud of the security he gives his Jews. Three years ago, after terror attacks against French Jews, he called on the community to come to Israel because their country can’t protect them. (Some 5,000 Jews have died in terror attacks in Israel.)
Je suis hyper fier que sorte enfin cet article sur lequel j’ai travaillé depuis près de 5 ans :
Je serais curieux d’avoir l’avis, les commentaires et les critiques des éminent.e.s spécialistes de la question sur seenthis...
J’ai réuni ici 181 chansons (dont 167 qui sont dans la playlist youtube qui accompagne cet article), de plus d’une trentaine de pays, avec leur contexte historique, politique et culturel.
La Palestine vaincra, et comme dit Saleh Bakri, la musique sera l’âme de la révolution !
La coupable indulgence du Collège de France vis-à-vis d’Israël -
Le Collège de France compte tenir le 7 juin une journée d’études en collaboration avec l’université de Tel Aviv. Cette journée doit se conclure par la signature d’un accord de coopération et s’insérer dans le cadre de la saison croisée France-Israël. Mettre ainsi à l’honneur un Etat qui enferme dans un ghetto une population de 2 millions d’habitants et tire sur la foule lorsque celle-ci tente de rompre son joug est inadmissible.
Contacté, l’initiateur de cette journée nous a répondu qu’elle était prévue de longue date et ne mettra nullement à l’honneur un État, mais relèvera des échanges scientifiques ordinaires que le Collège de France entretient avec des établissements de recherche et d’enseignement dans le monde entier. Autrement dit, « business as usual ». Ainsi donc plus de 120 tués et plus de 13000 blessés par l’armée israélienne ne suffisent pas au Collège de France pour réévaluer l’opportunité de tenir cette journée, de signer cet accord de coopération et de participer à cette saison croisée France-Israël indigne. L’assassinat de civils, d’enfants, de journalistes et de personnels médicaux par des tirs de snipers ne justifie-t-il pas aux yeux du Collège de France la moindre réaction ?
La signature d’un accord de coopération avec l’université de Tel Aviv est d’autant plus scandaleuse qu’est affilié à cette dernière l’Institut pour les études nationales de sécurité (INSS, Institute for National Security Studies), où a été forgée par le général Gadi Eizenkot la doctrine Dahiya de la force disproportionnée. Ainsi que l’explique Gabi Siboni, un analyste de l’INSS : « L’armée israélienne réagira immédiatement, de manière décisive et avec une force disproportionnée aux actions ennemies et aux menaces qu’il pose. Une telle réponse a pour but d’infliger des dommages et une punition à un point qui nécessitera des processus longs et coûteux de reconstruction. » Cette doctrine a été appliquée dans le passé par Israël lors de bombardements du Liban et de Gaza.
Gaza : chagrin et douleur pour Razan al-Najjar, assassinée par l’armée israélienne d’occupation
Linah Alsaafin & Maram Humaid - 1e juin 2018 – Al Jazeera – Traduction : Chronique de Palestine
Dans une interview accordée à Al Jazeera le 20 avril, Razan avait déclaré qu’elle estimait que c’était son « devoir et sa responsabilité » d’assister aux manifestations et d’aider les blessés.
« L’armée israélienne a l’intention de tirer autant que possible », a-t-elle déclaré à cette occasion. « C’est fou et j’aurais honte si je n’étais pas là pour mon peuple. »
S’adressant au New York Times le mois dernier, Razan parlait de l’enthousiasme qui était le sien pour le travail qu’elle faisait.
« Nous avons un objectif : sauver des vies et évacuer les blessés », disait-elle. « Nous faisons cela pour notre pays », disait-elle encore, ajoutant que son travail était humanitaire.
Razan ne tenait nul compte du jugement de la société envers les femmes faisant ce travail, auquel elle contribuait elle-même en faisant des quarts de 13 heures, commençant à 7 heures du matin jusqu’à 20 heures.
« Les femmes sont souvent jugées mais la société doit nous accepter », déclarait Razan. « Si elle ne veulent pas nous accepter par choix, elle sera néanmoins forcée de nous accepter parce que nous avons plus de force que n’importe quel homme. »
Sabreen [ la mère de Razan] nous dit aussi que sa fille était en première ligne pour soigner des manifestants blessés depuis le 30 mars – et pas seulement le vendredi. Elle était devenue un visage familier au camp de Khan Younis, l’un des cinq points de rassemblements installés le long de la clôture à l’est de la bande de Gaza.
« Elle ne s’est jamais souciée de ce que les gens pouvaient dire », raconte Sabreen. « Elle s’est concentrée sur son travail sur le terrain en tant qu’infirmière bénévole, ce qui était la preuve de sa force et de sa détermination. »
« Ma fille n’avait pas d’arme, elle était infirmière », ajoute-t-elle. « Elle a beaucoup donné à son peuple. »
Les médecins sur le terrain ont dit à plusieurs reprises à Al Jazeera que les forces israéliennes tiraient sur les manifestants avec un nouveau type de balle.
Connue sous le nom de « balle papillon« , elle explose lors de l’impact, pulvérise les tissus, les artères et les os, tout en causant de graves blessures internes.
« [Ma fille] a été délibérément et directement tuée par une balle explosive, ce qui est interdit par le droit international », déclare Sabreen.
« Je demande une enquête de l’ONU pour que le meurtrier soit jugé et condamné », dit-elle encore, qualifiant les soldats israéliens de « brutaux et impitoyables ».
Elle s’est ensuite tue.
Quand Sabreen a pu à nouveau parler, ses mots ont provoqué les pleurs des femmes autour d’elle.
« J’aurais aimé l’avoir vue dans sa robe blanche de mariée, pas dans son linceul, » dit-elle.
The online war between Qatar and Saudi Arabia - BBC News
A year-long political conflict between the tiny, wealthy state of Qatar and its larger neighbours - including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates - has been fought with a new arsenal of weapons: bots, fake news and hacking.
In the early hours of 24 May 2017, a news story appeared on the website of Qatar’s official news agency, QNA, reporting that the country’s emir, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani, had made an astonishing speech.
The quotes then appeared on the QNA’s social media accounts and on the news ticker running along the bottom of the screen on videos uploaded to the agency’s YouTube channel.
The emir was quoted praising Islamist groups Hamas, Hezbollah and the Muslim Brotherhood. And perhaps most controversially of all, Iran, Saudi Arabia’s arch-rival.
Qatari citizens have expressed their support for their emir on a mural in Doha
But the story soon disappeared from the QNA website, and Qatar’s foreign ministry issued a statement denying the speech had ever taken place. No video footage has ever emerged of the emir actually saying the words supposedly attributed to him.
Qatar claimed that the QNA had been hacked. And they said the hack was designed to deliberately spread fake news about the country’s leader and its foreign policies. The Qataris specifically blamed UAE, an allegation later repeated by a Washington Post report which cited US intelligence sources. The UAE categorically denied those reports.
But the story of the emir’s speech unleashed a media free-for-all. Within minutes, Saudi and UAE-owned TV networks - Al Arabiya and Sky News Arabia - picked up on the comments attributed to al-Thani. Both networks accused Qatar of funding extremist groups and of destabilising the region.
And soon after there was another alleged hacking - this time, targeted at the UAE. Youssef al-Otaiba, the UAE’s ambassador to the US was hacked. His emails were leaked to the press. This led to long, lurid articles about his private life in international media.
Why hysteria about Islam is clouding France’s fight against radicalization | Karina Piser
But even as scholars and practitioners have insisted on the social or personal drivers of radicalization that often have little to do with religiosity, the government seems fixated on Islam itself. The Interior Ministry official I spoke to complained about that apparent misreading: “I’m sorry, but sometimes when I hear Collomb talk, he says things that seem to undo all of the work we’ve been doing on the ground for years, that we do on a daily basis.” That, the official told me, is likely a function of “political choices of the moment that are made under pressure from public opinion,” at the expense of expertise—or that are often influenced by “mediatized experts who lack necessary knowledge of the field.” Source: (...)
Trump’s Loudest Anti-Muslim Twitter Troll Is A Shady Vegan Married To An (Ousted) WWE Exec | HuffPost
@AmyMek anonymously spread hate online for years. She can’t hide anymore.
By Luke O’Brien
She was supposed to be a Russian bot. That seemed like the best explanation for @AmyMek. No normal person could be so prolific and prejudiced.
For five years, the mysterious Twitter account ― which has more than 200,000 followers, including Sean Hannity, Roseanne Barr and the personal account of Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and has earned endorsements from Donald Trump and Michael Flynn ― has tirelessly spewed far-right propaganda and, above all, Islamophobia. Around 25 tweets a day, sometimes more, the majority of them designed to stoke hatred of Muslims.
Tweets like this: