• Who’s on First à Montréal - maîtres chez nous · Mapzen
    https://mapzen.com/blog/whosonfirst-nacis-2017

    I have described to you a series of overlapping grievances and past injustices that in no way will a gazetteer remedy alone. A gazetteer is only a tool but perhaps we can stop teaching our tools the bad habits of the past.

    A gazetteer is fundamentally about the relationships between one place and all the others. In the past we have been limited by economics and by physics and by no shortage of myopia in the kinds of relationships a gazetteer might allow.

    (...) The hope and the goal of Who’s On First is not that everyone should have to, or even want to, add their names and stories to our gazetteer but that they may be able do so when they choose to.

    #cartographie #nommage #histoire #canada #québec #leonard_cohen

    https://seenthis.net/messages/654130 via Fil


  • Is your company’s name hijacked in the Panama Papers? | McClatchy DC
    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/article76796537.html

    For one company, she presented a choice of the following names: TROY, VIVA VOCE, PANEM, Panem et Circenses and The Sacramento Bee. Aristidou received an email back suggesting that the last name was available.

    (...) the owners acted quickly with the new company and purchased an executive jet.

    #sacramento_bee #panama_papers #nommage #offshore_squatting !

    http://seenthis.net/messages/488047 via Fil


  • WHO issues best practices for #naming new human infectious diseases
    http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2015/naming-new-diseases/en

    Diseases are often given common names by people outside of the scientific community. Once disease names are established in common usage through the Internet and social media, they are difficult to change, even if an inappropriate name is being used. Therefore, it is important that whoever first reports on a newly identified human disease uses an appropriate name that is scientifically sound and socially acceptable.

    The best practices apply to new infections, syndromes, and diseases that have never been recognized or reported before in humans, that have potential public health impact, and for which there is no disease name in common usage. They do not apply to disease names that are already established.

    The best practices state that a disease name should consist of generic descriptive terms, based on the symptoms that the disease causes (e.g. respiratory disease, neurologic syndrome, watery diarrhoea) and more specific descriptive terms when robust information is available on how the disease manifests, who it affects, its severity or seasonality (e.g. progressive, juvenile, severe, winter). If the pathogen that causes the disease is known, it should be part of the disease name (e.g. coronavirus, influenza virus, salmonella).

    Terms that should be avoided in disease names include geographic locations (e.g. Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, Spanish Flu, Rift Valley fever), people’s names (e.g. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Chagas disease), species of animal or food (e.g. swine flu, bird flu, monkey pox), cultural, population, industry or occupational references (e.g. legionnaires), and terms that incite undue fear (e.g. unknown, fatal, epidemic).

    #maladies #nommage #guidelines #langage

    http://seenthis.net/messages/368955 via Fil